Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS

Published : 161 Documents
Articles

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DISERTAI STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN Se-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Fitriani, Nur Syarifah; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical, (2) which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random, (3) at each of learning models with scientific approach, which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with sequential concrete, sequential abstract, concrete random, or abstract random, (4) at each thinking style, which one of learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical. Population of the research was the seventh class students of Junior High School at Metro city on academic year 2014/2015. Instrument used to gather data were mathematics achievement test and thinking style questionnaire. Data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TTW-CM gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical, 2) Students with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random, students with abstract sequential gave the same achievement with concrete random, and abstract random, student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 3) In each learning models, student with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random. Students with abstract sequential had better achievement than students with concrete random, and abstract random, the student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 4) In each of thinking style, students who was subject to TTW-CM models gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical.Keywords: Think Talk Write, Numbered Head Together, Thinking Style, Achievement. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) BERBANTUAN SOFTWARE CABRI 3D DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Putra, Fredi Ganda; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the learning style of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. Its population was all of the students in grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Metro City in academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 278 students consisted of 90 in experimental class 1, 95 in experimental class 2, and 93 in control class. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test on the learning material of polyhedron and questionnaire of learning style. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (2) The students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style. (3) In each category of the learning style, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (4) In each of the learning models, the students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style.Keywords: TGT , Cabri 3D, Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN NGAWI Rizal, Ony Syaiful; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the students with inquiry learning, problem based learning model, or direct instruction; (2) which one having better mathematics learning achievement, the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) at each learning model, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) at each type of learning style, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between students taught using inquiry learning model, problem based learning model, or direct instruction. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unequal cell. From the research, it could be concluded as follows. (1) The students taught with problem based learning model had better learning achievement than those taught with both inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The students taught with inquiry learning model had better learning achievement than direct instruction. (2) The learning achievement of the students with auditory learning style was better than that of those with visual and kinesthetic learning style. The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic learning style. (3) In inquiry learning model, problem based learning model and In the direct instruction, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning style. (4) In the students with visual learning style, the use of problem based learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the use of inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The use of inquiry learning model provided the mathematics learning achievement as good as the use of direct instruction. In the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning model.Keywords: Problem Based Learning Model, Inquiry Learning, Mathematics Learning                         Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI E-KABUPATEN BLORA Kusumaningtyas, Yekti Putri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ levels of self concept, students having high, medium or low self concept in giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ levels of self concept in having mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each level of self concept, which one is better among Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional model in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Blora. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 309 students; consist of 105 students in the first experimental class, 105 in the second experimental class, and 99 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self concept. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had better achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had the same mathematics achievement, (2) the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model: the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each level of self concept: Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model better learning achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model had the same good mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT), mathematics learning achievement, and self concept.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Ardianzah, Ferri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAI  (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for  positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude 
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKAPADA SISWA KELAS X MIA SMAN 6 SURAKARTA Wulantina, Endah; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The research aims to describe the students’ creative thinking process of tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta in solving mathematics problems towards students who have high, medium and low ability in mathematics. The researcher choosed qualitative research in case study design. The results showed that 1). Students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with high ability in Mathematics are (a) Preparation, the students identify the prior knowledge about the assignment carefully than the students select the information in solving the problem appropriately; (b) Incubation, the students turn silent when they are thinking about how to solve the problem, the students memorize the way to solve the problem; (c) Illumination, the students continue the first idea which is found before; (d) Verification, the students recheck the problem solving before taking the conclusion, the students test the result by suiting to the data from the assignment. 2) The students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with medium ability in Mathematics are (a) preparation, the students identify well the problem which is being asked select the information appropriately but they need some stimulus from another person; (b) Incubation, the students turn silent when they are thinking about how to solve the problem, the students memorized the way to solve the problem; (c) Illumination, the students only focus on the relevant information and could not explore the idea to find out the idea, here students also need the stimulus from another person; (d) verification, the students recheck the result before taking conclusion; 3) the students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with low ability in Mathematics are: (a) Preparation, the students identify well the problem which is being asked, the students select the information recursively by comprehending the assignment. They also still need the stimulus in the form of question; (b) Incubation, the students memorize the appropriate pattern to solve the problem but sometimes they hesitate so they ask the problem to the researcher; (c) Illumination, the students solve the problem from what they already learnt from the previous way, the students focus on the relevant information and tent to avoid the complex information so that the student could not explore the idea to find out another idea, they tent to solve the problem with one idea; (d) Verification, the students recheck the result before taking conclusion but there are many corrections in the final answer.Keywords: Ability in Mathematics,  Creative Thinking Process, Mathematics Problem Solving.
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN DIMENSI MYER-BRIGGS SISWA KELAS VIII MTs NW SURALAGA LOMBOK TIMUR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Aziz, Abdul; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at describing the process of creative thinking of the eight grade students of MTs NW Suralaga East Lombok  in the academic year of 2013/2014, who had personality type based on the Myer-Briggs personality dimensions, namely rational personality type (STR) and guardian personality type (STG) in the mathematics problems solving on Wallas steps, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. The approach used descriptive qualitative approach in a case study. The data collection technique was conducted by using task based interview. The result showed that the procces of creative thingking on: (1) the STR students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read APS (assignment problem solving) silently, observed the instructions and information carefully, and mentioned the known and the asked things in  reading once APS; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent for a moment, the students do a contemplation activities, planned the problem solving, and took a long time to bring up the idea; (c) illumination, the students started by identifying the contained information in the APS, wrote how to solve the problem and continued by explaining the procedure of problem solving, the students established the steps to resolve the problem and got the idea by developing the idea of the previous answers; (d) verification, the students expressed orally the re-examination procedure of the answer, wrote the re-examination procedure, explained the re-examination procedure and explained the procedure again orally. (2) The STG students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read the APS silently, and in a loud voice, mentioned the current issues in the APS, wrote the problems on the answer sheet, mentioned the known and the asked things of APS after a given follow-up questions; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent, the students do a contemplation activities and arranged the plan of problem-solving when they were calm; (c) illumination, the students identified the information on APS and determined the attributes that were used to solve the problem, established the steps to resolve the problem, described the problem solving procedures, solved the problems by developing the idea from the previous idea; (d) verification, the students revealed and explained the re-examine procedure of the answer orally, wrote the re-examination procedure of the answer, observed and re-checked the problem solving that had been done.Keywords: Creative Thinking, Problem Solving, and Personality Type
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGITIGA DAN SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN TULANG BAWANG BARAT Ayuwanti, Irma; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research  were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, GI or direct learning model, (2) which one having better mathematics learning achievement, students with climbers, campers or quitters AQ, (3) in each learning models (NHT, GI and direct) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, climbers, campers or quitters AQ, (4) in each student AQ (climbers, campers, and quitters) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, GI or direct learning  model.This study was a quasi-experimental research. The research design used was a 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all VII graders of Junior High Schools throughout West Tulang Bawang Regency in the school year of 2014/2015. Meanwhile the sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 281 students: 93 students for experiment I class, 93 for experiment II class and 95 for control class. The instruments used to collect the data were learning AQ questionnaire and  mathematics learning achievement test. From the result of research, it could be concluded as follows: (1) NHT learning model provided mathematics learning achievement better than GI learning model and direct learning model, GI learning model provided mathematics learning achievement better than direct learning model. (2) The learning achievement of the students with climbers AQ was better than that of those with campers and quitters AQ, and the learning achievement of the students with campers AQ was better than that of those with quitters AQ. (3) In NHT learning model, students with climbers and campers AQ had the same achievement, students with climbers  and campers AQ had better achievement than students with quitters AQ; qqqin GI learning model, students with climbers and campers AQ had the same achievement, students with climbers AQ categories had better achievement than students with quitters AQ, students with campers and quitters AQ had the same achievement; in direct learning model, students with climbers, campers and quitters AQ had the same achievement. (4) In climbers AQ, NHT learning modelqqq gave the same achievement as GI learning model, NHT learning model gave better achievement than in direct learning model, GI learning model gave the same achievement as direct learning model; in campers AQ, NHT learning model gave the same achievement as GI learning model, NHT learning model gave better achievement than in direct learning model, GI learning model gave the same achievement as direct learning model; in quitters AQ, NHT, GI and direct learning model gave the same achievement. Keywords: NHT, GI, Direct Learning, and Adversity Quotient (AQ).
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW II DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA SMP SE-KOTA KEDIRI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Andriani, Desi Gita; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.192 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models (Jigsaw II, TPS and direct learning) on mathematics achievement viewed from student emotional quotient. The type of the research was quasi experimental research using design factorial 3x3. The population was the students in grade VII junior high school in a city of Kediri. The size of the sample was 339 students. Before giving the treatment, the population had to in balance condition. The balance test used unbalance one way analysis of variance. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of Jigsaw II type give better mathematics learning achievement than TPS type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type give better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (2) Students who have high emotional quotient have better mathematics learning achievement than students who have middle and low emotional quotient and then students who have middle emotional quotient have better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low emotional quotient. (3) For students who thougt by cooperative learning model of Jigsaw II type, TPS type, and direct learning, students who have high emotional quotient  have  better mathematics learning achievement than students who have middle and low emotional quotient and then students who have middle emotional quotient have better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low emotional quotient. (4) For students who have high, middle, and low emotional quotient, students who thougt by cooperative learning model of Jigsaw II type give better mathematics learning achievement than TPS type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type give better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. Keywords : Jigsaw II, TPS, and emotional quotient.  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI KOTA MADIUN Retno H, Rosa Rosdiana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Suyono, Suyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (381.864 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) which one provides better mathematics learning achievement: conventional, Numbered Heads Together, or Jigsaw with contextual approach learning model, (2) which one provides better mathematics learning achievement: the students with linguistic, logical-mathematics, or interpersonal intelligence, (3) in each multiple intelligence, which one provides better mathematics learning achievement: conventional, Numbered Heads Together, or Jigsaw with contextual approach learning model, and in each learning model, which one provides better mathematics learning achievement: the students with linguistic, logical-mathematics, or interpersonal intelligence. This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the seventh-year-students of State Junior High Schools of Madiun Municipality in the school year of 2012/2013 with the students of SMPN 4 Madiun, SMPN 6 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun as the sample. The research instrument used was mathematics learning achievement test and questionnaire of multiple intelligence. The hypothesis test used was unbalanced two way analysis of variances. The test on the hypothesis revealed that: (1) learning model of Jigsaw with contextual approach provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional and Numbered Heads Together learning model, while learning model of Numbered Heads Together provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional learning model, (2) there was no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with linguistic, logical-mathematics and interpersonal intelligence, (3) in each multiple intelligence, learning model of Jigsaw type with contextual approach provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional and Numbered Heads Together learning model, while learning model of  Numbered Heads Together provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional learning model, and in each learning model, there was no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with linguistic, logical-mathematics and interpersonal intelligence. Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Contextual Approach, Numbered Heads Together, Multiple Intelligence.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Abdul Ghofur Abdul Razak Adeyanto, Rizki Agus Darmawan Ahmad Husni Mubarok Ambar Nurhayati Anggrahini Anggrahini Ardiantoro, Gigih Ari Suningsih Arianti Puspita Dewi Ariastutik, Endah Arinta Rara Kirana Arisjanti, Nova Ayu Asip Cakra Buana, Asip Cakra Atik Fitriya N Budi Usodo Desi Gita Andriani Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Eli Widoyo Retno Endah Wulantina, Endah Farah Umami Fauzi Mulyatna, Fauzi Ferri Ardianzah, Ferri Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fina Hanifa Hidayati Fitriani, Nur Syarifah Frasetyana, Anita Diah Fredi Ganda Putra, Fredi Ganda Gatut Iswahyudi Guritno Ari Wibowo Habib Ratu Perwira Negara, Habib Ratu Habib Ratu Perwira Negara, Habib Ratu Perwira Hafidh Jauhari Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Iim Marfuah Ika Wulandari Imam Sujadi Indra Kurniawan Irma Ayuwanti, Irma Irnistisia, Firna Juitaning Mustika, Juitaning Khoiriah, Silfiatul Komarudin Komarudin Kurniawati, Eriska Fitri Labiba Zahra, Labiba Linda Sunarya Lingga Nico Pradana Mardiyana Mardiyana Merisa Kartikasari, Merisa MIFTACHUL ANAS Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Muhtarom Muhtarom, Muhtarom Munawaroh Munawaroh Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Nelly Indriastuti P Nina Nurmasari Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nirawati, Lia Septy Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurul Hidayati Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Panglipur Yekti, Sherly Mayfana Patrisius Afrisno Udil, Patrisius Afrisno Puput Suriyah, Puput Qurrotul ‘Ain, Qurrotul Rahayu Sri W Retno Sari, Retno Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi Riyadi Rosa Rosdiana Retno H Setiawan Wicaksono, Setiawan Sigit Rimbatmojo, Sigit Siti Mutmainah Soeyono Soeyono Solekhah, Rokhana Ayu Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Kuntari Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Suprapto Suprapto Supriyatin Supriyatin Susmono Susmono Suyono Suyono Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tri Yuliana Tunjung Genarsih, Tunjung Ubayu Wahyuning Awi Gangga Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi Via Yustitia, Via Wahyu Astuti Budi Wahyu Nofiansyah, Wahyu Wahyu Utomo Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Wulancar, Elis Dyah Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Zara Mertiana RZ