Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

KEHUJJAHAN HADIS MENURUT IMAM MAZHAB EMPAT Hamang, M. Nasri
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2011): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Jurusan Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam STAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (236.642 KB) | DOI: 10.28988/diktum.v9i1.282

Abstract

This article presents the opinion of imams of four Islamic legal schools (mazhab) regarding the validity of hadits as the source of Islamic law. This study shows that the opinion of the imams on that issue is various. According to Abu Hanifah, al-sunnah can be accepted as the source of Islamic law with the condition that it is related by reliable men. As to hadits ahad, he requires that it does not contradict the principles agreed upon by ‘ulama, and its content (matan) does not concern with general issues, nor does it contravene the qiyas. He even accept the hadits mursal if it does not contradict the Quran. While according to Malik bin Anas, hadits can be accepted as the argumentation (hujjah), not only for hadits mutawatir, but also for hadits masyhur, hadits mursal, and hadits ahad, with the condition that they do not contradict the actions of Madinah scholars. Idris al-Syafi’i contends that hadits ahad can be accepted as the source of Islamic law with the requirement that it is related by dhabith transmitter. This is also the case with the hadits mursal. According to Syafi’i, the status of hadits mutawatir is higher than hadits ahad and hadits mursal. Another imam, Ahmad bin Hanbal, uses all kinds of hadits, mutawatir, ahad, mursal, and dha’if, as the sources of Islamic law. He even prefers hadits dha’if
SISTEM IJTIHA DALAM HUKUM ISLAM (Metodologi Pembaruan Ibnu Taimiyah) Hamang, M. Nasri
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2010): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Jurusan Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam STAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.972 KB) | DOI: 10.28988/diktum.v8i1.297

Abstract

This article explores the ijtihad system in Islamic law with special reference to ibn Taimiyah’s reform method. This study reveals that ibn Taimiyah is one of proponents of reform in ijtihad methodology. In this methodology, he frequently follows the line of Hanbalite system, and neglects three other systems, Hanafite, Malikite, and Syafi’ite. He even produces some works according to his own methodology. Ibn Taimiyah lays so much emphasis on the application of ijtihad methodology based on Qur’an and Sunnah, yet does not neglect ijma’, qiyas, and maslahah mursalah, with strict requirement. He is different from Abu Hanifah who emphasizes the application of istihsan and ‘urf, from Malik who emphasizes maslahah mursalah, and from Syafi’i who prefers the istidlal methodology. Actually, ibn Taimiyah appreciates the rational faculty in analizing the texts (nash). According to him, the usage of rational reasoning makes Islamic law logical. In comprehending religious truth, especially related to natural phenomena and social life, ibn Taimiyah is an empiricist and rationalist. This in turn endorses the scientific experiment and direct observation.
Kehujahan Hadis Ahad Menurut Mazhab Suni dan Syi’ah Hamang, M. Nasri
AL-Fikr Vol 14, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : AL-Fikr

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the position of ahad hadis according to both Sunni and Shi’i scholars. As being commonly acknowledge by muslims that Sunni school strongly holds an transmitted materials (riwayat) and opinions of all scholars among the prophet’s companions, while Shi’i school based its reason on merely materials and opinions from ahlu bait companions. Both schools actually have the same conclusion on the possibility to use ahad hadis as a source in Islamic law, but a few issues on transmission requirements. Both Sunni and Shi’i agree that ahad hadis is applicable to ibadah (worship), but not to akidah (faith) Shi’i school in particular requires the transmitter of ahad hadis school be ma’sum (devirely protected).
BEBERAPA UPAYA HUKUM BAGI HAKIM DALAM SIDANG PENGADILAN DALAM RANGKA PUTUSAN DAN PENETAPAN HUKUM YANG ADIL MENURUT SYARIAT ISLAM (PERSPEKTIF HADIS NABI SAW) Hamang, M. Nasri
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syirah Vol 1, No 2 (2003)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/as.v1i2.201

Abstract

Salah satu maksud utama syariat Islam ialah terwujudnya keadilan dalam lalu lintas hukum umat manusia. Keadilan adalah hajat asasi tiap individu. Dalam mencapai kehidupan hukum adil itu. Hakim sebagai penegak hukum dituntut untuk melakukan berbagai upaya yang menjadi faktor penopang bagi tercapainya putusan dan penetapan hukum yang adil. Dalam tulisan ini, akan dilacak upaya-upaya hukum apa yang seharusnya dilakukan hakim dalam rangka mencapai putusan dan penetapan hukum yang adil.
SIRIK DAN WASILAH DALAM AL-QURAN Sebuah Kajian Syariyyah Berdasarkan Metode Tafsir Maudhui Hamang, M. Nasri
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syirah Vol 1, No 1 (2003)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/as.v1i1.189

Abstract

Syirik merupakan virus teologik yang paling berbahaya. Dalam al-Quran kata Syirik diitsbatkan sebagai sesesat-sesat kesesatan, sebesar-besar dosa besar dan seagung-agung kejaliman. Syirik dapat beraktual besar Syirik (al-Syirik al-Akbar), syirik kecil (al-Syirik al-Ashgar) dan syirik tersembunyi (al-Syirik al-Khafiy). Dalam aktualisasi keagamaan umat, seringkali seseorang melakukan berbagai bentuk amalan yang dipa-hami dan diyakininya sebagai wasilah yang bersifat dan bernilai ibadah, yang dapat mendekatkan diri kepada Tuhan Rabbul `Alamin, padahal sesungguh-nya tidak termasuk bentul wasilah yang diajarkan Islam dalam rangka taqarrub ilallah, bahkan boleh jadi tergolong sebuah tindakan syirik.
PERANAN PANTI ASUHAN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER ISLAMI ANAK PADA PANTI ASUHAN SITTI KHADIJAH KABUPATEN PINRANG NURHIKMAH, NURHIKMAH; HAMANG, M. NASRI
Kuriositas: Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol 7 No 2 (2014): Kuriositas: Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : P3M STAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (22.485 KB)

Abstract

This research is an explanation of islamic religion make attention in the form of outward and inward towards orphans as one of the main indicators for the quality of a person’s religious. Similarly, the act of 1945 by one of the article, which reads: the poor and neglected children maintained by the state, in a brightly lit also showed a high concern for the lives of orphans.As the implementation of the country’s attention, the government through the ministry of social affairs has provided the institutional and fnancial resources. At the ministry of social affairs, there is one special directorate in charge of fostering orphans, among others, especially by means of the orphanage. One orphanage long-standing and growing signifcant in the management orphanage orphanage is Sitti Khadija Pinrang. Sitti Khadija orphanage Pinrang is the best in Pinrang, even one of the best in South Sulawesi. Orphanage Sitti Khadija Pinrang looks from day to day more and get a good response from the government and the whole society
METODOLOGI TAFSIR ALQURAN BERBAHASA BUGIS KARYA AGH MUHAMMAD ABDUH PABBAJAH Hamang, M. Nasri
Al-Qalam Vol 19, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (123.225 KB) | DOI: 10.31969/alq.v19i1.225

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas profil metodologi tafsir Alquran al-Karim berbahasa daerah Bugis karya AGH(Anre Gurutta Haji) Muhammad Abduh Pabbajah. Tafsir tersebut menjadi penting bukan hanya karenapenulisnya salah seorang ulama besar di Sulawesi Selatan (yang biografinya masuk dalam EnsiklopediIslam), melainkan secara akademik, metodologi yang ditempuhnya memiliki kekhasan yangmembedakannya dengan umumnya metodologi yang ditempuh para mufassirin, baik mutaqaddiminmaupun mutaakhkhirin. Salah satu yang menonjol dari kekhasan itu ialah sistematikanya yang dimulaidari Juz 30-Juz ‘Amma (yang biasa distilahkan dengan Alquran Kecil) ke Juz 1 sampai 29 (yangbiasa diistilahkan dengan Alquran Besar). Dalam hal kekhasan itu sendiri pun, ditafsirkannya secarasedemikian mudah untuk dipahami oleh masyarakat (umat Islam suku Bugis). AGH MuhammadAbduh Pabbajah menempuh seperti itu-dalam arti-dengan lebih mendahulukan Juz ‘Amma denganpertimbangan, surah-surah dalam Juz ‘Amma lebih sering dijadikan oleh masyarakat muslim sebagaipappanguppu dalam salat. Di samping itu, kandungan surah-surah dalam Juz ‘Amma adalah berkenaanmasalah teologi sebagai ajaran agama yang prinsipil.
KEHUJJAHAN HADIS MENURUT IMAM MAZHAB EMPAT Hamang, M. Nasri
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2011): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (236.642 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v9i1.282

Abstract

This article presents the opinion of imams of four Islamic legal schools (mazhab) regarding the validity of hadits as the source of Islamic law. This study shows that the opinion of the imams on that issue is various. According to Abu Hanifah, al-sunnah can be accepted as the source of Islamic law with the condition that it is related by reliable men. As to hadits ahad, he requires that it does not contradict the principles agreed upon by ?ulama, and its content (matan) does not concern with general issues, nor does it contravene the qiyas. He even accept the hadits mursal if it does not contradict the Quran. While according to Malik bin Anas, hadits can be accepted as the argumentation (hujjah), not only for hadits mutawatir, but also for hadits masyhur, hadits mursal, and hadits ahad, with the condition that they do not contradict the actions of Madinah scholars. Idris al-Syafi?i contends that hadits ahad can be accepted as the source of Islamic law with the requirement that it is related by dhabith transmitter. This is also the case with the hadits mursal. According to Syafi?i, the status of hadits mutawatir is higher than hadits ahad and hadits mursal. Another imam, Ahmad bin Hanbal, uses all kinds of hadits, mutawatir, ahad, mursal, and dha?if, as the sources of Islamic law. He even prefers hadits dha?if
SISTEM IJTIHA DALAM HUKUM ISLAM (Metodologi Pembaruan Ibnu Taimiyah) Hamang, M. Nasri
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2010): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.972 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v8i1.297

Abstract

This article explores the ijtihad system in Islamic law with special reference to ibn Taimiyah?s reform method. This study reveals that ibn Taimiyah is one of proponents of reform in ijtihad methodology. In this methodology, he frequently follows the line of Hanbalite system, and neglects three other systems, Hanafite, Malikite, and Syafi?ite. He even produces some works according to his own methodology. Ibn Taimiyah lays so much emphasis on the application of ijtihad methodology based on Qur?an and Sunnah, yet does not neglect ijma?, qiyas, and maslahah mursalah, with strict requirement. He is different from Abu Hanifah who emphasizes the application of istihsan and ?urf, from Malik who emphasizes maslahah mursalah, and from Syafi?i who prefers the istidlal methodology. Actually, ibn Taimiyah appreciates the rational faculty in analizing the texts (nash). According to him, the usage of rational reasoning makes Islamic law logical. In comprehending religious truth, especially related to natural phenomena and social life, ibn Taimiyah is an empiricist and rationalist. This in turn endorses the scientific experiment and direct observation.