Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pertumbuhan, Produktivitas dan Hasil Hablur Klon Tebu Masak Awal-Tengah di Tanah Inceptisol ,, supriyadi; Khuluq, Ahmad Dhiaul; Djumali, dan
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 46 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.145 KB) | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v46i2.17088

Abstract

Sugar cane is a strategic commodity for the Indonesian government as raw material for the national sugar industry. Cultivation of sugar cane has been shifted to dry areas dominated by Inceptisol, Vertisol, and Ultisol soil. These conditions require certain clones to obtain high sugar yield. New improved varieties have been developed and 8 early-mid maturiting clones have been obtained. The study was aimed to evaluate and obtain earty-mid maturing clones with higher sugar yield than the existing varieties in dry land of Inceptisol soil. The study was conducted at the Karangploso Experimental Station, Malang from July 2015 to September 2016. The study was arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatment consistsed of eight clones of early to mid maturing sugarcane clones and one control variety (Kenthung). The eight clones were (1) PS 04 117, (2) PS 04 259, (3) PS 04 129, (4) PS 05 258, (5) PS 06 391, (6) PS 06 370, (7) PS 06 188, and (8) JR 01. The results showed that three clones (PS 06 188, PS 05 258 and JR 01) produced higher sugar yield (10.45-11.88 ton ha-1), and the other clones showewd lower sugar yield (6.55-9.37 ton ha-1) than that of Kenthung variety (9.16 ton ha-1).PS 06 188 and PS 05 258 clones obtained the highest sugar yield of 11.88 and 11.49 ton ha-1, respectively.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM HAL PERSAMAAN NOMOR HAK SERTIPIKAT PADA OBYEK TANAH YANG BERBEDA (Studi Kasus Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sukoharjo) ,, Supriyadi; ,, Isharyanto
Jurnal Repertorium Vol 5, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThe study aims to analyze the causes of the emergence of the equation of certificate numbers on different soil objects and to know the legal protection efforts against the certificate holder with the same number on different land objects at the National Land Office of Sukoharjo Regency.Research method with empirical juridical approach. Data collection techniques with interviews and literature studies are books or documents related to the problem under study.The results of the issuance of land title rights certificate due to the writing of the same certificate number in the Land Office of Sukoharjo Regency has been in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations, namely Government Regulation No. 24/1997 on Land Registration and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs / Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 concerning Provisions on Implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. Issuance of land certificate by the Land Office (BPN) is a legal act in the field of state administration. Legal protection of the substitute certificate holder due to the writing of the same certificate number in the Land Office of Sukoharjo Regency which has been issued is the same as the legal protection against the holder of the land title certificate in general. Basically a land certificate is a powerful evidence, which provides legal certainty and protection for its owner. Because after the issuance of the certificate of replacement because of writing the same certificate rights number, then the cancellation of the certificate that is due to write the same certificate rights number with one of them crossed out and replace it with a new number.Keywords: Legal Protection, Equal Rights NumberAbstrak Penelitian bertujuan menganalisa penyebab munculnya persamaan nomor sertipikat pada obyek tanah yang berbeda  dan mengetahui upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang sertipikat dengan nomor yang sama pada obyek tanah yang berbeda pada Kantor Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Sukoharjo.Metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan yaitu buku atau dokumen yang terkait dengan masalah yang diteliti.Hasil penelitianpenerbitan sertifikat pengganti hak atas tanah karena penulisan nomor hak sertifikat yang sama di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sukoharjo telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, yaitu Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah dan Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendafataran Tanah. Penerbitan sertipikat tanah oleh Kantor Pertanahan (BPN) adalah perbuatan hukum di bidang tata usaha negara. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang sertifikat pengganti karena karena penulisan nomor hak sertifikat yang sama di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sukoharjo yang telah diterbitkan sama dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang sertifikat hak atas tanah pada umumnya. Pada dasarnya sertifikat tanah merupakan alat bukti yang kuat, yang memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemiliknya. Karena setelah terbitnya sertifikat pengganti karena karena penulisan nomor hak sertifikat yang sama, maka dilakukan pembatalan terhadap sertifikat yang karena penulisan nomor hak sertifikat yang sama dengan salah satunya mencoret dan menggantinya dengan nomor yang baru.Kata Kunci    :   Perlindungan Hukum, Persamaan Nomor Hak Sertifikat 
YURISDIKSI PERADILAN TERHADAP PRAJURIT TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA Budi Utami, Niken Subekti; ,, Supriyadi
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 3, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11102

Abstract

AbstractThis research intends to find the answers of two problems. First, the factors that led to the unimplemented jurisdiction of the General Court of the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) that perform general crime as mandated by Decree No. VII / MPR / 2000 and Act No. 34 of 2004. Second, the perception of the military conception of justice with jurisdiction over soldiers who committed the crime. This study is a normative- empirical law that uses secondary data and primary data. The data collected by the study of documents and interviews. The data analysis using qualitative methods. The results showed that first the jurisdiction of the General Court of the soldiers who committed the crime can not be implemented because of the general Act No. 31 of 1997 on Military Justice has not been revised by Law Military Justice as new, second that some of the military still wants the soldiers who committed the crime, criminal acts both military and general crime, is in the jurisdiction of Military Justice.Keywords: Jurisdiction Court, Indonesian Army Forces (TNI)l, Crime.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan jawaban atas dua permasalahan. Pertama, faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan belum diimplementasikannya yurisdiksi Peradilan Umum terhadap prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI) yang melakukan tindak pidana umum sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Ketetapan MPR Nomor VII/MPR/2000 dan  Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004. Kedua, persepsi kalangan militer mengenai konsepsi peradilan yang berwenang mengadili prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif-empiris yang menggunakan data sekunder dan data primer. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi dokumen dan wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama yurisdiksi Peradilan Umum terhadap prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana umum belum dapat diimplementasikan karena Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer belum direvisi dengan Undang-Undang Peradilan Militer yang baru, kedua bahwa beberapa kalangan militer tetap menghendaki agar prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana, baik tindak pidana militer maupun tindak pidana umum, berada pada yurisdiksi Peradilan Militer.Kata Kunci: Yurisdiksi Peradilan, Prajurit TNI, Tindak Pidana
PENGARUH URUTAN BUKTI, GAYA KOGNITIF, DAN PERSONALITAS TERHADAP PROSES REVISI KEYAKINAN Nasution, Damai; ,, Supriyadi
Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi Vol 10, No 1 (2010): APRIL
Publisher : LEMBAGA PENERBIT FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/mraai.v10i1.2797

Abstract

Researches that tried to examines effect of evidence order and individual psychological dimensions, consist of cognitive style and personality, to auditors’ judgment never been examined in auditing, especially, in belief-revision context. Present research is first. Present research focused on examination the influence of evidence order, cognitive style, and personality to auditors’ judgment. Judgment in this research is define to how auditor revised his believe based on evidence that evaluated step-by-step. Experiment method use in this research. Using a case study out of to 88 auditor, this research found that: (i) auditors’ judgment were affected by order in which audit evidences was evaluated;(ii) when auditor evaluated evidences in reverse order (- - + + vs. + + - -), recency effect occur. This finding show that auditor will weighted disconfirmation evidence more important than confirmation evidence; (iii) interaction exist between evidence order, cognitive style, and personality to affect auditors’ judgment.