cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Justitia et Pax
ISSN : 08521883     EISSN : 25413007     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
JEP is primarily aimed to facilitate the legal scholars, researchers or practitioners in publishing their original or reviewed articles as well as to support the enactment of in-depth discussions on the related issues. It is also purposed to become a source of reference for those are involved in legal field. JEP covers any topics related to Indonesian laws and legal system, spanning from the private and public law and covering various legal approaches, such as the comparative law, sociology of law, legal history and many others. Other contemporary legal studies, such as commercial and business law, medical law, law and technology, natural resources law and Islamic law are also covered. Hence, any contributions from legal scholars and practitioners are appreciatively welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 64 Documents
TINJAUAN PENANGANAN KASUS MALPRAKTEK MEDIS DI PENGADILAN PIDANA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KESEHATAN Soge, Albertus
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1286.886 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i1.2467

Abstract

Legislation on Health Law is a Lex Specialist law that contains exceptional norms for legal protection for providers and receivers of health services. Law Number 36 of 2009 on Health and Law Number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice are not used consistently in resolving medical malpractice cases in the Criminal Court, thus causing injustice and legal uncertainty. Incorrect application of the law and a long period of cases resolution in court requires reform in handling medical malpractice cases.
MENGGUGAT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG PENCALONAN MANTAN NARAPIDANA DALAM PEMILU Ghafur, Jamaludin
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2436

Abstract

The constitutional court through its decision No. 42 / PUU-XIII / 2015 states that all ex-convicts may run in elections as long as their political rights are not revoked by the court. They are only required to honestly and openly announce to the public about their convict status. according to the Court, the limitation and even revocation of the political rights of ex-convicts must not be carried out by lawmakers through legislation instruments but must be with a court decision as regulated in Article 35 paragraph (1) number 3 of the Criminal Code. This decision is not entirely correct for two reasons. First, Indonesia as a country that adheres to a continental European legal system (civil law system), the law has a higher position as a source of law (primary sources of law). Whereas the court's decision only as one of the secondary sources of law. Second, the conflict between the Election Law and the Criminal Code should be resolved according to the lex specialis derogat legi generalist principle. Thus, the prohibition for ex-convicts to run for the election as regulated in the Election Law should be interpreted as a specialist regulation so that it can override the provisions contained in the Criminal Code.
MACROPRUDENTIAL AND MICROPRUDENTIAL POLICY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 21 OF 2011 Christiani, Anita; Lisai, Rendhy Oktovianus
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1370.442 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2434

Abstract

The establishment of FSA has brought about the consequences of macroprudential policies which are still under the authority of Bank Indonesia while the microprudential  policies have been the Auhtority of FSA. The problem in this study is what the appropriate definition, characteristics and coverage of macroprudential and microprudential supervision regulatory authority are in order to support the economic stability of a country. This type of research was a normative study. The results showed that the definition of macroprudential regulation and supervision policy is the authority given to Bank Indonesia to conduct regulation and supervision of banking institutions out of the institution and health fields, prudential aspect, and bank examination. The characteristics of microprudential and macroprudential banking regulation and supervision can be seen from the policy focus.
PROSPEK PEMBERLAKUAN HUKUM ADAT DALAM HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL Setyawan, Vincentius Patria
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2069

Abstract

This study aims to determine the existence of customary law specifically related to customary offenses in national criminal law and its implementation that has been applied so far, and to find out the prospects for its application after the HP bills have been implemented. The results of this research are to provide an overview of present and future.
PERKEMBANGAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN VERSTEK: STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN DAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA Sundari, Elisabeth; Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (894.817 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2936

Abstract

Article 25 of HIR provides that in case the defendant does not appear at court process (verstek), the claim will be accepted unless it is unreasonable and against the rights. In the beginning, that article was interpreted that in case the defendant doesn?t  appear at court process (verstek), the plaintiff shall not obeyed to proof his claim. How is the development of that previous interpretation? Normative legal research has been conducted to redress that issue. The data were collected from secondary data resources from Sleman and Yogyakarta District Court decisions concerning the burden of proof  in verstek recently,  and being  analized  qualitatively. The research result shows that there is a development in  interpretating Article 125 HIR, where the judges burdened the plaintiff to proof his claim. That interpretation development supports the strive to get the truth beyond reasonable doubt, to meet a fair decision,  as good as to avoid fraud claim, and haphazard decision.
EVALUASI YURIDIS SISTEM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM DAN IUS CONSTITUENDUM PERADILAN KHUSUS PEMILIHAN UMUM Ulya, Nurul Ula; Musyarri, Fazal Akmal
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (423.477 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2508

Abstract

The General Election Judicial System in Indonesia currently runs partially in Indonesia because the institutional structure that plays a role in handling General Election cases consists of elusive anatomy. Some of these institutions include the Constitutional Court, the Election Supervisory Body, the Administrative Court and the District Court which have different portions of authority and lack synergy in their representation. This can lead to miscoordination and overlapping of authority. Therefore, the formation of a Special Election Judicial body is an alternative solution that can be done to maintain the implementation of a democratic General Election up to the stage of case resolution.
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) Fauzani, Muhammad Addi; Rohman, Fandi Nur
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.485 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501

Abstract

This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 TERHADAP HAK TANAH PELAKU KAWIN CAMPUR Khairunnisa, Jihan
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (824.592 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2497

Abstract

Land ownership for Indonesian citizens the result of mixed marriages without marriage agreement Indonesian citizen can only use the use rights and lease rights to buildings in the ownership of land. This study uses a normative juridical approach. It can be concluded that according to Law No. 5/1960 for Indonesian citizens, mixed marriages may own land with a status other than use rights and lease rights to buildings if there is a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Constitutional Court ruling number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gave a breath of fresh air for mixed marriages to still be able to receive their constitutional rights by making marriage agreements during the marriage.
JAMINAN SOSIAL TENAGA KERJA DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI NEGARA KESEJAHTERAAN DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF Nur Rohanawati, Ayunita
Justitia et Pax Vol 32, No 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v32i1.759

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to determine the social security system adopted by Indonesia, see Indonesia as a function of the welfare state as mandated by the 1945 Constitution has not done well, and to know the view of progressive legal theory legislation related to social security in providing solutions to the problems of social security the workforce. This research is devoted to the study of normative legal systematics, which is intended to determine the implementation of a theory of the legal conditions that exist in society. Results of this study produces a secondary data. The data obtained from the document collection process or library materials. Of the collection process, the data were analyzed qualitatively, systematically arranged, and presented descriptively. The results showed that Indonesia is still not able to fully administer social security for the people, where social security is still a “black and white” but the State has not been able in practice to assume responsibility for the implementation of social security as a whole. About social security, the Government is still not able to provide significant changes to the equalization gain social security for the workers, but changes in social security regulations on labor is performed repeatedly. Necessary party whom dared to take a policy or decisions that benefit the workers to realize the welfare of the workers. Parties reffered to the law is used as a progressive peeler, is a party that has an important role that enterpreneurs and the Industrial Relations Court Judge.Keywords: Social Security, Labour, Progressive LawIntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sistem jaminan sosial yang dianut Indonesia, melihat fungsi Indonesia sebagai negara kesejahteraan sesuai amanat Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 belum terlaksana dengan baik, serta untuk mengetahui teori hukum progresif memandang peraturan perundang-undangan terkait jaminan sosial tenaga kerja dalam memberikan solusi atas permasalahan jaminan sosial tenaga kerja tersebut.Penelitian ini bersifat normatif yang dikhususkan pada penelitian sistematika hukum, yang dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui implementasi pelaksanaan suatu teori terhadap kondisi hukum yang ada di masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini menghasilkan suatu data sekunder. Data tersebut diperoleh dari proses pengumpulan dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Dari proses pengumpulan tersebut, data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif disusun secara sistematis dan disajikan secara deskriptif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia masih belum mampu secara seutuhnya menyelenggarakan jaminan sosial bagi rakyat, dimana jaminan sosial tersebut masih sebatas “hitam diatas putih” namun, negara belum mampu dalam pelaksanaannya untuk mengemban tanggung jawab pelaksanaan jaminan sosial tersebut secara utuh. Tentang jaminan sosial tenaga kerja, pemerintah masih belum mampu memberikan perubahan yang signifikan terhadap pemerataan perolehan jaminan sosial tenaga kerja bagi para pekerja tersebut, padahal perubahan peraturan tentang jaminan sosial tenaga kerja tersebut berulang kali dilakukan. Diperlukan pihak yang berani untuk mengambil suatu kebijakan atau keputusan yang bermanfaat bagi pekerja demi terwujudnya kesejahteraan bagi pekerja. Pihak sebagaimana dimaksud jika hukum progresif yang digunakan sebagai alat pengupas, adalah pihak yang memiliki peran penting yaitu pengusaha dan Hakim Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.Kata Kunci: Jaminan Sosial, Tenaga Kerja, Hukum Progresif.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA SALAH TANGKAP (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 2161K/PID/2012) sibarani, sabungan
Justitia et Pax Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1439.157 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i2.1668

Abstract

AbstractThe number of cases of wrongful catches of late shows police negligence in performing their duties. For example in the case of Hasan Basri. The purpose of this research is to know the function of the Police in law enforcement in Indonesia, to know the accountability of Police investigators and the victim's legal efforts in the case of wrongful catch or error in persona. The research method used in this research is the normative juridical approach  The function of the Police in law enforcement in Indonesia is one of the functions of state government  The accountability of Police investigators refers to the provisions Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Police of the Republic of Indonesia and the code of ethics of the police. The legal efforts that need to be done by the victim who experienced the wrong of catching them is pre-trial, if the case has not been entered the main trial of the case. If the case has reached the principal trial of the case, the victim may claim damages and rehabilitation .Keywords: Law Analysis, Error in Persona, Court Decision. AbstrakBanyaknya kasus salah tangkap akhir-akhir ini menunjukkan kelalaian polisi dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Misalnya dalam kasus Hasan Basri. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui fungsi Polisi dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia, untuk mengetahui akuntabilitas penyidik Kepolisian dan upaya hukum korban dalam kasus salah tangkap atau salah orang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Fungsi Kepolisian dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia adalah salah satu fungsi pemerintah negara. Akuntabilitas penyidik Kepolisian mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dan kode etik kepolisian. Upaya hukum yang perlu dilakukan oleh korban yang mengalami kesalahan dalam menangkapnya adalah pra-persidangan, jika kasusnya belum masuk persidangan utama kasus tersebut. Jika kasus tersebut telah mencapai persidangan utama dari kasus tersebut, korban dapat mengklaim ganti rugi dan rehabilitasi.Kata kunci: Analisis Hukum, Kesalahan Tangkap, Putusan Pengadilan.