cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rinaldy Amrullah
Contact Email
jurnal.corruptio@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6285758142309
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.corruptio@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung Prof. Soemantri Brojonegoro St. No. 1, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung 35145
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Corruptio
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 27232573     EISSN : 27459276     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Journal Corruptio is an international journal of anti-corruption published by the Law Faculty of Universitas Lampung as a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. The Journal Corruptio publishes two issues in a year, on January and July that provides open accessed journal in attempts for all published content in the journal is available for free without charged fees toward users and their institutions. The Journal Corruptio opens access directly to the completed substance based on the principle of free research availability to support significant global knowledge exchange. The Corruptio Journal is a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. Scope and Focus of the journal consist as follows: a. Law enforcement Law enforcement is an effort to enforce the function of law and norms in the society. Generally, law enforcement aims to act as a behavioral guidance of the society’s behaviour. In the Journal Corruptio, law enforcement discusses topics on concept of law enforcement and rehabilitation. These discussions on law enforcement are applied on corruption cases, behavioral, and philosophy in Indonesia. b. Prevention Law consist of 2 (two) natures which are prevention and repression. The scope of Journal Corruptio, leans to law’s function of preventing. Prevention means the law acts as preclusion against crimes, specifically crimes of corruption. Prevention in the Journal Corruption is executed through dissemination, socialization, and other platforms to insert values that could hinder corrupt behaviors for example, corruption, collusion, nepotism, money laundering. c. Protection Law protection defines an aegis towards the human rights of the society in order to enjoy their rights to its fullest. In the Jounal Corruptio, protection highlights protection towards witnesses in order to provide them security and convenience during their trial process of giving facts and evidential statements.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi Dan Nepotisme Dalam Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Di Provinsi Lampung Tantyo, M. Gian
Corruptio Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2098

Abstract

Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah adalah mekanisme pengeluaran pemerintah yang memainkan peran penting dalam pemanfaatan anggaran negara. Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah melibatkan jumlah uang yang sangat besar, sehingga pemerintah disebut sebagai pembeli terbesar di negara ini. Dalam praktiknya, secara umum pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa konstruksi Pemerintah sering menimbulkan masalah, termasuk pelanggaran baik prosedur pengadaan barang/jasa konstruksi dengan konspirasi yang tidak tepat dan pelanggaran yang merugikan Negara atau terkait dengan tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh organisasi pengadaan barang/jasa konstruksi. Hasil penelitian ini pada akhirnya memberikan jawaban bahwa penyebab korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah di Provinsi Lampung adalah 1) Dana yang sangat besar dikeluarkan untuk mengubah proyek menjadi penggoda yang kuat untuk mengundang koruptor, 2) Sejumlah besar data ternyata dilengkapi dengan administrasi rencana proyek pemerintah yang tidak jelas dan tertutup. Sedangkan upaya penanggulangan korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah di Provinsi Lampung meliputi: a) Tindakan pencegahan, dalam bentuk: Pengawasan dan Pengadaan Elektronik (E-Procurenment) dan b) Tindakan represif, yaitu: hukum penegakan hukum dengan penerapan sanksi pidana yang ketat. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa itu harus dirumuskan dengan jelas tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah dari penyedia barang dan jasa serta pada pejabat yang berwenang dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah.
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Tidak Di Laporkan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara Dalam Penyeleksian Calon Pimpinan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Salim, Wilson Gunawan
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2074

Abstract

Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is a state institution that in carrying out its duties and authority is independent and free from the influence of any power. The Report of State Official Assets (LHKPN) is a list of all the assets of the State Administrators as outlined in the LHKPN form determined by the Corruption Eradication Commission. Selection Candidates for the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission are not required to submit a Report on the Wealth of State Administrators (LHKPN), the statement was said by the Chairman of the Selection Committee Yenti Garnasih. how the consequences of not considering the LHKPN (Report on the Assets of State Assets) by the KPK leadership candidate selection committee in terms of Article 29 of Law Number 30 Year 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission Jo. Article 5 of Law Number 28 of 1999 concerning State Administration that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism relating in announcing the assets of prospective KPK leaders. The State Administrators are obliged to be willing to inspect their assets before, during and after taking office, report their assets at the first time in office, transfer, promote and retire, and to announce their assets. The purpose of making LHKPN is as part of the authority possessed by the KPK, which is to carry out steps or efforts to prevent the occurrence of other forms of corruption by registering and examining LHKPN. The report on the assets of state administrators should be enforced prior to the completion of the selection of candidates for the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission because this is intended as an effort to open the candidates for KPK leaders and as an effort to prevent corruption.
Studi Komparatif Antara Justice Collaborator Dengan Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Gultom, Laura Naomi Rotua
Corruptio Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2099

Abstract

The Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator play a role in facilitating the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption, because none other than people involved in institutions suspected of corrupt practices and in other words the witness's information is key for disclosure of a case of corruption. The problem in this study is whether the similarities and differences between justice collaborator and whistleblowers in corruption, and how is the legal protection between justice collaborator and whistleblower in criminal acts of corruption. This research uses normative juridical and juridical empirical research methods with qualitative data analysis. The data sources used in this study are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that whistleblower equations and justice collaborator were in 3 (three) categories, namely vision and mission in uncovering criminal acts of corruption, guarantee of protection in the form of physical, psychological and legal protection, and awards where whistleblowers and justice collaborators cannot be prosecuted criminal and civil and given sentence relief. In addition to these equations, there are also differences between whistleblowers and justice collaborator divided into 4 (four) categories, namely subject, motivation, guarantee of protection, and procedural law. The protection between justice collaborator and whistleblower in corruption namely legal protection in the form of keeping the identity of the witness confidential and then provides security for witnesses in the trial process by providing physical, psychological, and legal protection.
Peradilan In Absentia Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Welang, P. Iskandar
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2071

Abstract

Peradilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan cara in absentia merupakan suatu penyimpangan atau terlarang dikarenakan dianggap sebagai pelanggaran hak asasi terdakwa sehingga menyebabkan hak bagi terdakwa untuk melakukan suatu pembelaan akan hilang atau terabaikan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 196 Ayat (1) KUHAP. Peradilan dengan cara in absentia hanya diperbolehkan untuk pelaku pelanggaran lalu lintas saja. Lalu bagaimana seandainya peradilan dengan cara in absentia diterapkan pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yang meliputi pendekatan empiris yang dilakukan melalui penelitian langsung di lapangan, dan pendekatan normatif yang dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan terkait dengan perundang-undangan, hasil penelitian dan literatur lainnya. Pada pelaksanaannya peradilan dengan cara in absentia untuk perkara korupsi tidak melanggar hak-hak tersangka karena kepada terdakwa tetap diberikan haknya untuk mengikuti tahapan demi peradilan pidana baik sejak proses penyelidikan, penyidikan dan persidangan, akan tetapi dalam hal ini terdakwa tidak mau menggunakan atau memanfaatkan hak-haknya yang telah diberikan dan dijamin peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana yang diatur dalam KUHAP.
Pengembalian Keuangan Negara Perkara Korupsi Melalui Eksekusi Integral Oleh Kejaksaan Resli, Lutfy
Corruptio Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2100

Abstract

The Prosecutor's Office has obstacles and obstacles in carrying out additional criminal executions in the payment of money in lieu of corruption cases which resulted in many arrears in corruption case executions. The Prosecutor's Office made efforts to recover state finances through policies in an integrated manner so that they could carry out criminal executions of replacement money. This research uses the normative juridical approach and empirical juridical approach. Then the data analysis is done qualitatively which then draws conclusions that are inductive. Based on the results of the study, the return of state finances in corruption cases is carried out through an integral execution policy of the Prosecutor's Office in criminal law which cannot be carried out using the provisions of Article 18 of the Corruption Law. Constraints on the financial return of the state of corruption cases through integral execution by the Prosecutor's Office in the previous law due to the non-stipulation of procedures for carrying out additional criminal executions in the form of payment of replacement money. Suggestions in this research are efforts to recover state finances through the execution of additional substitute penalties suggested by taking the civil route then the government immediately enacted the asset seizure bill in order to facilitate prosecutors carrying out criminal executions in the case of corruption and make forgiveness policies to bleach payment of replacement money for convicted persons..
Eksistensi Peranan Jaksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Pratama, Arie Satria Hadi
Corruptio Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2095

Abstract

Ketentuan alternatif sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 18 Ayat (2) dan Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menimbulkan suatu problematika bagi Jaksa dalam melakukan eksekusi putusan pengadilan yang menjatuhkan pidana tambahan berupa pembayaran uang pengganti kepada terpidana. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah peranan Jaksa dalam pelaksanaan pembayaran uang pengganti tindak pidana korupsi dan mengapa terjadi faktor penghambat dalam pelaksanaan pembayaran uang pengganti tindak pidana korupsi.
Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Kurniawan, Ivan
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2070

Abstract

The narcotics crime is one of the extraordinary crimes so that it is specifically regulated in act of Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning Narcotics. The perpetrators and other parties involved in narcotics crime certainly understand the severe consequences of what they do. In connection with the above problem, there is one interesting decision to be reviewed and analyzed, which has been decided by the panel of judges is the decision number: 124 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN.TJK in which the perpetrator commits two offenses at once so that the sentence could be sentenced whether it has been be fair. This study will focus on legal issues, namely knowing the responsibility of the perpetrators of narcotics and money laundering crimes. analyze the court's decision Number: 124 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN.TJK whether it has fulfilled a sense of justice that is beneficial. This study uses a Normative Juridical approach by analyzing a court decision. As for the results of the study found that: According to the analysis of researchers seen from the criminal responsibility has fulfilled the elements of error, the ability to be responsible, evil inner attitude, and there is no reason to forgive. Court Decision Number: 124 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN.TJK has fulfilled a useful sense of justice. Based on research shows that the verdict given is considered fair because the defendant's actions have damaged the nation's generation and remembering that the defendant's actions committed two offenses namely violating Article 131 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning Narcotics and Article 5 paragraph (1) letter c of the Act Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes. As for the suggestions that can be submitted in this study, it is better for the police in an effort to prevent the circulation of narcotics and money laundering so that they coordinate well with the financial transaction analysis tracking center and also the national land agency so that the assets of drug dealers or traffickers can be properly tracked.
Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Habib, Ali
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2069

Abstract

The Handling of corruption now is indeed more oriented to how to put as many corruptors as possible into a Penitentiary, while corruption itself is still rampant. The deterrent effect which is currently no longer felt by corruption convicts while serving prison sentences and the overflow of prisoners who are no longer sufficient, makes the government move quickly and look for a legal breakthrough related to reducing the level of corruption in Indonesia. The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia (RI) as one of the Law Enforcement Officers who have the authority to carry out Corruption Criminal Investigations has issued a Circular Letter for the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (SE Jampidsus) Number: B-765/F/Fd.1/04/2018 dated  April 20 2018 concerning the Technical Guidelines for Handling Corruption Case Investigation Stage, which in essence the Investigation must be strived to find the amount of State Financial Losses, which meant the cooperative attitude of the parties involved to recover the financial losses of the State, it can be taken into consideration as a non-continuation of the legal process which certainly takes into account certain limitations (restorative justice). The problem is how to apply the restorative justice model in an effort to recover state losses. The research results obtained are, the application of restorative justice methods conducted by the Republic of Indonesia's Attorney General's Office can be optimally used in handling corruption cases specifically for the recovery of state finances and future expectations related to handling cases of corruption in Indonesia.
Changes in Corruption Eradication Commission In Legal Sociology Perspective Sriwidodo, Joko
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2073

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission is an independent state institution whose job it is to carry out the duties and powers of corruption eradication free from any power. The Corruption Eradication Commission was born during the reign of President Megawati, namely through Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. In 2019 there was a revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, but the revision was opposed by the public, because the change was seen as likely to weaken the Corruption Eradication Commission. Observing the brief description above, the researcher in this paper wants to raise at least 2 problems, namely; 1), Are the three foundations for the formation and amendment of the Prevailing Laws, namely juridical, philosophical and sociological elements that have been fulfilled in the amendment of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law? 2), is the amendment to the Corruption Eradication Commission Law in accordance with the expectations and realities in society from the perspective of legal sociology? This paper would like to try to provide an overview of the Corruption Eradication Commision and the Amendment to the Corruption Eradication Commision Law, both in the prevailing legal normative theory and in current practice. This research is a normative legal research which is carried out through library research. The discussion in the research, if viewed from the aspect of fulfilling the foundation for the formation and changes of laws and regulations, then the amendments to the Corruption Eradication Commision have fulfilled these aspects, namely philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects in which the Corruption Eradication Commision itself has existed for 17 years in carry out its duties and authorities as an agency to eradicate corruption. Meanwhile, from the perspective of legal sociology, the public does not want any changes to the Corruption Eradication Commision, in which the Corruption Eradication Commision is still the institution of public trust in eradicating corruption in Indonesia.
Pembuktian Terbalik Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Hasan, Hafizah
Corruptio Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2072

Abstract

Corruption occurs along with the development of the increasingly common era, which demands law enforcement and the legal justice system in Indonesia to make an effort in optimizing the handling of corruption by focusing on the evidence system. Singapore represents one of the countries that has implemented a reverse proof system. According to the Singapore 2019 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index (TI-CPI), the third position with the lowest level of corruption. Therefore Singapore's achievements will help to measure the efforts to optimize the handling and prevention of fraud in Indonesia. Through a literature study that compares the reversal proof system in the country of Singapore by using deductive logic to draw general matters for research results.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 1, No 2 (2020) Vol 1, No 1 (2020)