Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALISA PERBANDINGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL, DESKLAB DAN BONDEK PADA PEKERJAAN BEKISTING JEMBATAN GIRDER TIPE I PADA PROYEK JALAN TOL BOGOR – CIAWI - SUKABUMI susanti, Irriene Indah
Rekayasa Sipil Vol 8, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22441//jrs.2019.V08.i2.01

Abstract

Pada saat ini perkembangan teknologi konstruksi yang bervariasi menjadikan alternatif yang cukup baik dalam pembangunan proyek konstruksi, akan tetapi keterbatasan sumber daya yang ada menjadi tolak ukur yang dipertimbangkan dalam pemilihan metode maupun material yang akan digunakan dalam pelaksanaan konstruksi. Seluruh stake holder terkait dalam pembangunan sangat mengharapkan pekerjaan dapat dilakukan dalam waktu yang singkat, mutu yang dapat diandalkan dan biaya yang ekonomis. Bila dilihat dari sudut pandang kontraktor, biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi salah satu faktor yang sangat berpengaruh dalam pelaksanaan konstruksi, oleh karena itu pemilihan metode perlu direncanakan dan diteliti secara matang. Cara yang digunakan dalam pelaksanaan konstruksi yaitu dengan mencari alternatif bekisting di dalam pelaksanaan konstruksi. Hasil dari analisa biaya pada masing-masing metode bekisting dalam /m2 yaitu : biaya bekisting konvensional sebesar Rp. 401.228, biaya bekisting bondek sebesar Rp. 236.835, biaya bekisting deckslab precast sebesar Rp. 1.069.303. Dari hasil analisa tesebut maka dapat disimpulkan, metode bondek adalah pilihan yang tepat untuk digunakan sebagai bekisting pelat lantai pada jembatan karena biaya yang dikeluarkan lebih efisien bila dibandingkan dengan bekisting konvensional dan deckslab precast.
COMPARISON OF METHOD WORK IMPLEMENTATION IMPROVEMENT OF SLOPE STABILITY IN TERMS OF COST AND TIME Susanti, Irriene Indah; Aprianti, Anis Eka
Neutron Vol 20 No 01 (2020): JULY 2020
Publisher : NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/neutron.v20i01.52

Abstract

Rampa street - Poriaha / Mungkur (WINRIP) is one location that has a slope angle on its slopes prone to landslides, causing damage to some roads. Based on these conditions, the Ministry PUPR slope handling project launched on this road. In practical improvements slope stability was conducted using three methods: manlift, hanging platforms and scaffolding. All three methods have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of both cost and time. To obtain the results of the comparison of cost and time to do the direct observation and study of literature, the comparative results obtained on the cost and time to get the method implementation in accordance with needs. From the three methods, the lowest cost and the fastest duration of the results implementation method using manlift with cost of Rp 1,557,623,470 and duration of work 29 days
Cost and Time Analysis of the Acceleration Earthworks with the Method of Adding Heavy Equipment to the Depok-Antasari Toll Road Project Susanti, Irriene Indah; Rimawan, Fahmizan
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies Vol. 2 No. 6 (2021): Forthcoming Issue
Publisher : Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.qems324

Abstract

The development of Depok-Antasari Toll road construction was delayed by the work on the implementation of land work of 30.70% from the original plan presentation so that The initially planned time was completed in August 2019 extended to be completed in December 2019. In this study will analyze the acceleration of completion duration on The construction project of Depok–Antasari Toll road with an alternative to the number of heavy equipment. The purpose of this research is to know the cost of project that is physical and duration of time is faster by using the alternative. The results of the analysis was obtained that total project cost under normal conditions is IDR. 9,860,552,249.00 with the duration of project execution 130 working days. In the condition after accelerated with the addition of the number of heavy equipment alternative– 1 obtained a fee of Rp. 10,030,638,486.00 or more expensive 1.02% of the project cost in normal conditions and duration Project execution of 109 business days or faster 21 days from the normal duration. While the total cost of the project in the alternative condition–2 obtained Rp. 10,153,918,103.00 or more expensive 1.04% of the project cost under normal conditions and duration of project execution 104 days or faster 26 days from the normal duration. It can concluded that the acceleration of work by alternative method-1 is a more effective and economical acceleration alternative, because By applying an alternate acceleration–1. The duration of project work is faster than normal circumstances and does not experience a delay of employment from the planned time of 120 days. And the total budget cost of the project is cheaper compared to the alternative acceleration method-2.