Ainol Ainol, Ainol
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong, Probolinggo

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

METODE PENAFSIRAN AL-ZUHAYLî DALAM AL-TAFSîR AL-MUNîR Ainol, Ainol
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): DESEMBER
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (580.013 KB)

Abstract

The first and the foremost authority interprets the Koran is the Prophet Muhammad because he was receiving a direct Koran. After the Prophet, the authority was followed by his companions, tâbi?în, and mufassir afterward. Interpretations performed above the companions known as tafsîr bi al-ma?thur. This commentary underlies the discussion and its source in history. This method became known as a method of interpretation of the Koran is called the method of history. In addition, the method used at that time was the tafsîr bi al-ra?y underlying source on reasoning and ijtihâd. One contemporary commentator who try to combine the two sources of the interpretation is Wahbah al-Zuhaylî. The interpretation of the content approached the Koran, from a classic interpretation that many make al-ma?thur as the source and from the angle of the many modern and contemporary make ra?y as the source
METODE PENAFSIRAN AL-ZUHAYLî DALAM AL-TAFSîR AL-MUNîR Ainol, Ainol
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): DESEMBER
Publisher : Jurusan Tafsir Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (580.013 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2011.1.2.142-154

Abstract

The first and the foremost authority interprets the Koran is the Prophet Muhammad because he was receiving a direct Koran. After the Prophet, the authority was followed by his companions, tâbi?în, and mufassir afterward. Interpretations performed above the companions known as tafsîr bi al-ma?thur. This commentary underlies the discussion and its source in history. This method became known as a method of interpretation of the Koran is called the method of history. In addition, the method used at that time was the tafsîr bi al-ra?y underlying source on reasoning and ijtihâd. One contemporary commentator who try to combine the two sources of the interpretation is Wahbah al-Zuhaylî. The interpretation of the content approached the Koran, from a classic interpretation that many make al-ma?thur as the source and from the angle of the many modern and contemporary make ra?y as the source